The Supreme Court of India(SCI)on Monday July 18,2016 accepted the major recommendations of the
Lodha Committee on reforms to the BCCI, including a bar on ministers and
civil servants and those above 70 from becoming its members. It,
however, left it to Parliament to decide whether it should come under
the RTI and betting on the game should be legalised.
The court accepted the recommendations of the committee headed by
retired Chief Justice of India Justice R M Lodha to have a CAG nominee
in the BCCI.
A Bench of Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice F M I Kalifulla rejected
the BCCI’s objection against recommendation of one-State-one-vote. It
said that States like Maharashtra and Gujarat that have more than one
cricket association will have voting rights on a rotational basis.
It accepted the recommendation that there should be a players
association in the BCCI and the funding of players’ association accepted
while leaving it to the Board to decide the extent of funding.
The Bench accepted the recommendation that one person should hold one
post in cricket administration to avoid any conflict of interest and
scrapping of all other administrative committees in the BCCI after the
CAG nominee comes in.
The court, however, left it to Parliament to decide whether the
functioning of the BCCI can be brought under RTI as recommended by the
Lodha panel and whether to legalise betting in cricket or not.
It left it to the Board to decide whether there is need for any change
in the existing agreement relating to broadcasting rights and whether a
franchise member should be in the Board to avoid any conflict of
interest.
The Bench requested the three-member panel, also comprising former apex
court judges Ashok Bhan and R V Raveendran to oversee the transition of
administrative structure in the BCCI which has to take place within six
months.
The apex court-appointed Lodha Committee, on January 4, recommended
sweeping reforms and an administrative shake-up at the troubled BCCI,
suggesting that ministers be barred from occupying positions, a cap put
on the age and tenure of the office-bearers and legalising betting.
Some of the State cricket associations, former players Kirti Azad,
Bishen Singh Bedi and cricket administrators also approached the apex
court with regard to the implementation of Lodha panel recommendations.
It's the end of the road for Sharad Pawar, N Srinivasan
The Supreme Court verdict accepting the Lodha Committee
recommendations on age-cap of 70 years on BCCI office-bearers on Monday
July 18,2016 effectively means the end of the road for veteran administrators like
Sharad Pawar, N. Srinivasan, and Niranjan Shah to name a few.
The
Supreme Court verdict, as per recommendations, will also mean that BCCI
president Anurag Thakur (Himachal Pradesh), Secretary Ajay Shirke
(Maharashtra), Treasurer Aniruddh Chaudhary (Haryana) and Joint
Secretary Amitabh Chaudhary (Jharkhand) will have to forego their
positions in their respective state associations to avoid “Conflict of
Interest”.
No comments:
Post a Comment