In a major setback to Sebi, Securities Appellate Tribunal(SAT) Monday Sep 09,2019 overturned the SEBI's
order banning Price Waterhouse Coopers from auditing any listed company
for two years for its role in the Rs 7,800-crore Satyam Scam
However, Securities Appellate Tribunal(SAT) partly allowed disgorgement of the Rs 13 crore fee from the auditor.
The scam saw the Ramalinga Raju-promoted company going belly up in January 2009.
Setting aside the ban on PwC, which is one of the Big Four global accounting firms, SAT said, only the national auditors watchdog ICAI can take any action against its members and fraud cannot be proved on the basis of negligence in auditing.
"Sebi has no authority to look into the quality of audit and auditing services. Sebi can only take remedial and preventative action. The direction issued is neither remedial nor preventive. But punitive," SAT said.
If there was any dereliction of duties, it was on the part of the two partners for which the other 10 firms cannot be banned just because they have some resource sharing agreements, the tribunal added.
However, it said there has been breach of duty, therefore, the entire fee of Rs 13 crore can be taken back with interest from PWC
On January 8, 2009, Satyam Computer Services founder- chairman B Ramalinga Raju had publicly admitted and confessed to large-scale financial manipulations to the tune of over Rs 5,000 crore in the company's books. A Sebi probe however found the scam was much higher at Rs 7,800 crore
Soon after the admission, the government superseded the Satyam board and initiated a sale process, which in April 2009 ended TechMahindra taking over the company.
However, Securities Appellate Tribunal(SAT) partly allowed disgorgement of the Rs 13 crore fee from the auditor.
The scam saw the Ramalinga Raju-promoted company going belly up in January 2009.
Setting aside the ban on PwC, which is one of the Big Four global accounting firms, SAT said, only the national auditors watchdog ICAI can take any action against its members and fraud cannot be proved on the basis of negligence in auditing.
"Sebi has no authority to look into the quality of audit and auditing services. Sebi can only take remedial and preventative action. The direction issued is neither remedial nor preventive. But punitive," SAT said.
If there was any dereliction of duties, it was on the part of the two partners for which the other 10 firms cannot be banned just because they have some resource sharing agreements, the tribunal added.
However, it said there has been breach of duty, therefore, the entire fee of Rs 13 crore can be taken back with interest from PWC
On January 8, 2009, Satyam Computer Services founder- chairman B Ramalinga Raju had publicly admitted and confessed to large-scale financial manipulations to the tune of over Rs 5,000 crore in the company's books. A Sebi probe however found the scam was much higher at Rs 7,800 crore
Soon after the admission, the government superseded the Satyam board and initiated a sale process, which in April 2009 ended TechMahindra taking over the company.
No comments:
Post a Comment