The Madras High Court on Friday Oct 21,2016 issued an order banning
registration of plots and houses in unapproved housing layouts as well
as conversion of agricultural land for non-agricultural use in an
unplanned manner in Tamil Nadu.
“We direct that no
registering authority in the State shall register any sale deed in
respect of any plot in unauthorised layout or any flat/ building
constructed on such plots,” said the First Bench of Chief Justice S.K.
Kaul and Justice R. Mahadevan.
The Bench said the
order was necessary to save the ecology and prevent flooding while
simultaneously giving time to the State government to come up with
legislative changes.
It then directed the Inspector
General of Registration to circulate the order to all registering
authorities (Sub-Registrars) in the State.
The
interim directions were passed on a public interest litigation petition
filed by advocate ‘Elephant’ G. Rajendran seeking a direction to the
government to forebear the local administration from giving approval or
permission to convert agricultural lands into housing layouts and
forebear the Registration Department from registering such property.
The
Bench expressed its concern over the absence of any provision for
regulating conversion of agricultural lands that were uncultivated for
more than three years.
The Madras High Court on Friday Oct 21,2016 indicated that its earlier order prohibiting registration of unapproved plots converted as house-sites was not a blanket ban, but was limited to some categories of registration that were of concern to it.
Registration need not be denied in all cases: HC
The Madras High Court on Friday Oct 21,2016 indicated that its earlier order prohibiting registration of unapproved plots converted as house-sites was not a blanket ban, but was limited to some categories of registration that were of concern to it.
When the
matter came up before the First Bench, it was informed that registration
was not taking place even in some categories that were not covered by
the concern of the court. Therefore, it permitted counsel for
petitioners who had approached it for relief to categorise their
applications based on the nature of the land being registered. Once the
categorisation was complete, the Bench said it would consider modifying
or lifting its earlier order of September 8,2016
The
First Bench, comprising Chief Justice S.K. Kaul and Justice R.
Mahadevan, took note of Section 22-A of the Tamil Nadu Registration
(Amendment) Act, 2008, notified on October 20, 2016. “It is fairly
stated with this provision coming into force, sub-section (2) would
prevent registration of instruments of lands converted as house sites
without [approval of] development of such land from planning authorities
concerned. However, the difference is that the proviso excludes the
house sites which were already registered as such.” The Bench gave an
instance of a category of registration for which there can be no
impediment: agricultural land sought to be transferred as agricultural
land, with an undertaking to use it as such. There might be other
similar cases. Those applicants seeking to be impleaded, after some
discussion, agreed that they would categorise these registrations, so
that specific orders may be obtained regarding instruments that were
unnecessarily not being registered.
Once the
categorisation was done, the Bench said it would examine those
categories that might still require adjudication with reference to the
government’s policy. After counsel stated that a two-week period would
be sufficient for the categorisation to be worked out, the Bench
adjourned the hearing to November 16 with the observation that it would
consider modifying or lifting its earlier order after the categorisation
was submitted to the court.
×
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete